epilp88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Fuck the IRS! Tar and feather 'em like the British Stamp Tax collectors in 1765!

epilp88 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You said it!

KevinMerck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"I am not anti IRS. I am anti IRS abuse of power."The very existence of the IRS as the enforcement arm of the Federal Reserve, (which is nothing more than a consortium of private bankers) is in and of itself an abuse of power. There is no place in America for the Federal Reserve and the IRS. They were brought into existence illegally and they need to be rooted out or we will more than likely not survive as a nation.

LBB2156 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I am not anti IRS. I am anti IRS abuse of power.Is anyone having problem with the IRS agents.Drop me a line, please.

KevinMerck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Join the nearly 70,000,000 people who wised up and stopped paying this extortion.Make people like the infamous squid get real jobs instead of sitting on the computer all day harassing people about taxes. "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious."-Thomas Jefferson There have been parasites like the squid throughout history. Make this freeloader get a job.

eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@RetSquidSo why was the Secretary of the Treasury talking about Non-Resident Aliens throughout the entire Treasury Decision when the case was about a New York Citizen?Is it because it is a citizen of the state and not a citizen of the United States and it's territories?

eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@RetSquidSo why was the Secretary of the Treasury talking about Non-Resident Aliens throughout the entire Treasury Decision when the case was about a New York Citizen?Is it because it is a citizen of the state and not a citizen of the United States and it's territories?

eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@RetSquid Treasury Decision First Paragraph-"Under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railway [sic] Co., decided January 24, 1916, it is hereby held that income accruing to nonresident aliens in the form of interest from the bonds and dividends on the stock of domestic corporations is subject to the income tax imposed by the act of October 3, 1913."

eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@RetSquid Treasury Decision First Paragraph-"Under the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railway [sic] Co., decided January 24, 1916, it is hereby held that income accruing to nonresident aliens in the form of interest from the bonds and dividends on the stock of domestic corporations is subject to the income tax imposed by the act of October 3, 1913."

eklypse0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

@RetSquid The entirety of Treasury Decision was based off of the court case "Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railway".Non-Resident Alien specific information. What sort of disconnect must you have to say that it had nothing to do with Brushaber?Why would the US Treasury be talking about nothing but Non-Resident aliens when the case that the decision was about was a New York citizen? Doesn't the Secretary know about connecting the decision to the court case that it reference?